Version 1.3 (ratified February 2004)

Figure 1
No part of the competitor or implement will touch
One of the competitor's feet may touch as long as the other foot is completely within the throwing area.
Any part of competitor may touch as long as he is under control.
Open Stone
| Standard Weight: | Men | 16 lbs. and 22 lbs. |
| Women | 8 lbs. and 12 lbs. |
There is no standard size or weight of the stone. The stone must be PUT with one hand and with the stone remaining against the neck throughout the throw until the release. Any throwing style may be used as long as the rules are followed and the style is deemed safe by the judge. The backline will be drawn 7'-6" from the trig. (“A legal put must be made from the shoulder with one hand only so that, during the attempt, the shot does not drop behind or below the shoulder.” NCAA Track & Field definition of a “put”.)
Braemar Stone
| Standard Weight: | Men | 22 lbs. to 26 lbs. |
| Women | 11 lbs. to 18 lbs. |
The same rules apply in the Braemar Stone Put as in the Open Stone Put except, there is no approach on the trig allowed. The stone must be put from a standing position. Reversing the feet after the release is allowed.
| Standard Weight: | Men | 28 lbs. and 56 lbs. |
| Women | 14 lbs. and 28 lbs. | |
| Master | 28 lbs. and 42 lbs. | |
| <190# | 28 lbs. and 42 lbs. |
The weight will be thrown with one hand only. The weight shall be made of metal but can be of various shapes and sizes including spherical, bullet or box shaped. The handle can either be attached directly to the weight or attached with a length chain. The handle may also be of various shapes and thickness such as a ring, triangle or "D" shaped. The total weight of each implement will be at least 14 lb., 28 lb., 42 lbs. or 56 lbs.
The implement shall not measure more than 18" in overall length. Any throwing style may be used as long as the rules are followed and the style is deemed safe by the judge. The backline will be drawn 9'-0" from the trig.
| Standard Weight: | Men | 16 lbs. and 22 lbs. |
| Women | 9 lbs. and 12 lbs. |
The hammer head shall be made of metal, and the shaft shall be of wood, rattan, bamboo, or plastic (PVC pipe is sometimes used for increased durability). The total weight of each hammer will be at least 9lbs., 12 lbs., 16 lbs., and 22 lbs. The length of the hammer shall be no longer than 50" in overall length (48” for women). The hammer will be thrown with the feet in a fixed position and the thrower facing away from the trig and the throwing area. There is no approach allowed in the hammer throw. The competitor may move his feet after the hammer is released. No back line is drawn for the Hammer Throw, and sidelines are normally not drawn either. All fouls besides the backline foul still apply. Once the hammer makes contact with the ground in the throwing area (whether accidental or on purpose) the attempt is completed. However, the thrower may begin the attempt with the hammer ahead of the trig.
It is recommended that two or more cabers be used for a competition. One qualifying caber and one or two competition cabers. There is no standard size or weight of a caber, but the caber should be of a length and weight such that at least half the competitors can turn it. The caber is to be made only of wood. The caber shall be placed upright for the competitor, with the heavy end on top. The attempt begins when the competitor lifts the caber from the ground. If the competitor drops the small end of the caber back to the ground after having picked it up, this shall count as one attempt. It is recommended that a back judge and a side judge be used. The judge may set boundaries if he feels the ground in a certain area is not suitable for the caber to be tossed or to provide safety for the spectators (i.e. the Dodge line). The competitor may take any length of run they wish and may toss the caber from where they choose, as long as it is within the judge's boundaries. The caber must pass through the vertical position (90 degrees from the ground) in order to count as a turned caber. It is up to either judge to determine if the caber has passed through it. The "clock face method" of judging shall be used. The caber in a perfect toss will pass through the vertical position and land with the small end pointing directly at 12 o'clock away from the competitor in an imaginary straight line extending from the competitor through the initial landing point. An overhead view is drawn in Figure 2 below to demonstrate a 12 o'clock toss.

Figure 2
A valid throw is when the small end of the caber passes through the vertical position and falls away from the competitor to land within the 180 degree radius between 9 o'clock and 3 o'clock. An overhead view is drawn below in Figure 3 to demonstrate some turned cabers and how to score them.

Figure 3
The caber shall be judged on its landing position, not the position to which it may bounce or roll. If the caber is not turned by the competitor, then it is the responsibility of the side judge to determine the angle at which the caber was tossed with respect to the 90 degree vertical. The side judge should be perpendicular to the competitor's direction of run in order to make an accurate call. (Side judging is only done on the qualifying caber. Other cabers only score if they are turned). A drawing of a view from the side judge's position is shown below in Figure 4.
DEFINITION: Dodge Line: A safety line designation for the Caber event. This line is laid out for the caber area 20’ inside the spectator fence and 20’ away from any other events or tents. The rule is then stated that “The competitor has to stay within the Dodge lines AND the top (heavy end) of the caber has to land inside the Dodge lines. This will assure that the caber in its entirety will land inside the fence and away from other events or tents.”

Figure 4
Each competitor is allowed three attempts per caber, all of which will be scored and the best of these to be used to determine placing. In the event of a tie then the next best attempt or attempts shall be used to determine placing. The order of placing shall be determined by the nearest to 12 o'clock toss made by a competitor. If the competitor did not turn the caber, then placing shall be determined by the toss closest to the 90 degree vertical. When a qualifying caber(s) is used then any successful turn qualifies the competitor for the next caber (Qualifying cabers will be scored either by clock face or degrees, in order to assure correct the placing within the class). Competitors may only be allowed one or two attempts with the qualifying cabers. Ties are broken by comparing the next best attempt for each competitor involved in the tie. The competitor with the next best score places highest. If other ties occur, this process is repeated for all previous attempts. A Pass on a caber counts as a ‘no time’.
| Standard Weight: | Men | 20 lbs. (16 lbs. or 20 lbs. for Amateurs) |
| Women | 10 lbs. | |
| Master | 16 lbs. | |
| <190# | 16 lbs. |
The sheaf will be a burlap or plastic bag filled with a suitable material such as straw, mulch, or rope. The sheaf will be thrown over a crossbar for height with a pitchfork. The total weight of the bag shall be at least 16 lbs. or 20 lbs. for men and 10 lbs. for women. If there is a master's or lightweight (under 190#) class they will throw a 16 lb. sheaf. The toss shall be made in any manner deemed safe, using a pitchfork with at least two tines.
| Standard Weight: | Men | 56 lbs. |
| Women | 28 lbs. | |
| Master | 42 lbs. | |
| <190# | 42 lbs. |
The weight will be thrown with one hand only. The weight shall be made of metal but can be of various shapes and sizes including spherical, bullet or box shaped. The handle can either be attached directly to the weight or attached with a length chain. The handle may also be of various shapes and thickness such as a ring, triangle or "D" shaped. The total weight of each implement shall be at least 28 lb., 42 lbs. and 56 lbs. The implement shall not measure more than 18" in overall length but a weight shorter than this is normally used when thrown for height to avoid hitting the ground when swung between the legs. Any throwing style may be used as long as the rules are followed and the style is deemed safe by the judge.
| Most points wins | Least points wins |
|---|---|
| 6 | 1 |
| 5 | 2 |
| 4 | 3 |
| 3 | 4 |
| 2 | 5 |
| 1 | 6 |
Introduction: Below is a list of the Scottish Heavy events and the decathlon values (Points per foot) that are associated with them. The caber event, being the premier heavy event, is weighted a little heavier than the other events. There is no formula on how to “value” a stone since they all throw different and shapes very so much. The best way to value your stone is to see what your average throws are in all of the other events and then take that average divided by the average distance of your stone and get a “stone value”. Of course you will have to cut the value a little if the stone is your strongest event. If you do use this method top determine the value of the Stone, it should only be done once and not changed every year.
Classes: An athlete generally starts out as a “C” athlete. If an athlete consistently averages over 500 pts, then, they need to move to the “B” class, or if an athlete breaks 550 once, he is a “B”. A “B” athlete can consider moving up to the “A’s” if his average is constantly in the 620-630 avg. pt. Range. If he breaks 650/660 once, he will be “moved to the “A’s”.
Point Values:
| Event | Points Per/Foot |
| 25# Braemar (men) | 27 (stones vary) |
| 16# Braemar (women) | 26 (stones vary) |
| 56# WFD | 24m |
| 42# WFD | 18m |
| 28# WFD | 12m/24w |
| 14# WFD | 12w |
| 09# Hammer | 6.67w |
| 12# Hammer | 8.23w |
| 16# Hammer | 6.67m |
| 22# Hammer | 8.23m |
| 10# Sheaf | 32w |
| 16# Sheaf | 27m |
| 20# Sheaf | 32m |
| 28# WFH/WOB | 60w |
| 42# WFH/WOB | 45m |
| 56# WFH/WOB | 60m |
Caber Value: Weight x Height x Taper Factor = women's value (men's value: women's value x 0.55 = men’s value)
To get the taper factor: taper value / remaining length = taper factor
Taper factor: measurement from top of Caber to balance point. Remaining Length: total length of Caber minus Taper Value

Example Caber: weight =70 lbs. length=18’ taper value=8.0 remainder=10.0
70 x 18 x 0.80 = 1008 (x 0.55)=554.4 total points
For every minute of a turned Caber before or past 12:00 is 0.6 point (a score of 12:10 would be a deduction of 6 points from the total point value of the caber) max points deducted for 3 hours would be 108. If the Caber does not turn and a score in degrees is awarded, use the following formula:
(Caber value – 108) * (degrees / 100)
example: If the above caber is scored as a 60 degree attempt by the side judge, then the score would be as follows:
(554-108)*(60/100) = 268 points Measuring the Distance Events To convert the distances to scores in the distance and height events, it is best to score them in feet & decimals of feet (instead of feet & inches). For the distance events, RMSA highly recommends the use of Engineers tapes that are marked in feet & decimals of feet. They are fairly easy to find. Many tapes have feet & decimals of feet on one side and feet & inches on the other side. This makes it much easier to perform the calculations or enter into a computer for the calculations. For the height events, either kind of tape will work since we generally have the bar set at even feet or half feet increments.
Scoring Program: The RMSA has the scoring program available as an Excel spreadsheet.
In the late 1970’s at the Rocky Mountain Highland Games in Golden, Colorado, we had an athlete who had a background in track & field and in one of his first games, he almost won the overall (based on a 5-4-3-2-1 system), but he could not even get the 60 pound qualifying caber turned. Since the caber event is the premier event, this bothered us at the time that we might crown an overall champion who couldn’t turn a caber but built up enough points in the distance events to win. Since there was also a very strong emphasis on the athletes competing in all 7 events (a heptathlon), a scoring system based on how far or high an athlete threw each implement would be a more fair way to crown a champion. After researching the decathlon scoring for track & field, most of the events were pretty easy to determine a factor. We started with the current world records and rounded off the factors for ease of scoring. The two events that were more difficult were the sheaf & caber.
The sheaf was interesting because with the old “push” method, we used a 6 foot fork to hoist the bag. So in our initial method, we subtracted the length of the fork out and then figured the factor. In a full review after the first 8 years of results, we dropped the length of fork issue and re-factored the numbers. Part of the reason for this was the new method (the flick) introduced by Larry Satchwell took the length of the fork out of the equation.
The caber was obviously going to be the most difficult event to implement a scoring system for. In our region we had always used multiple cabers for each group – a qualifying caber first (if you turned it, you could attempt the next caber and so on). Typically 2 or 3 cabers per class. We originally did this because we had such a wide degree of ability within our typically amateur groups. We had both a men’s group and a women’s group. Multiple cabers are better for the crowds to witness more successful turns of the caber (that’s what they come to see). At some games that use one caber, we’ve seen a group of 7 compete and out of 21 attempts with the one caber, we had one turn. That’s not good for the crowd. I liken it running the sheaf toss or weight for height by putting the bar at a height where only the top competitors can get it over, then judging by seeing how close or how far over the bar the implement went on each of the three attempts.
We consulted with a physics teacher, describing the event and the caber. It was at his suggestion that the taper factor of the caber was going to be important. We already knew that if you had two cabers of equal weight and length, but one caber had no taper, it was going to be much tougher to turn. In terms of physics, once you toss the caber, it will turn around its center of gravity. With a better (lower) taper factor, that point moves upward and the caber has more chance to turn before encountering an obstacle (the ground).
We had to first value any particular caber and then devise a way to deduct points if the toss was not 12:00. Our first attempt at valuing a caber was pretty dead on. We took the weight times the length times the taper factor (taper factor is figured by laying the caber across another caber and determining the balance point. If an 18’ caber balanced at 8’ from the fat end and 10’ from the skinny end, then the taper factor was 8 divided by 10). Then we picked an arbitrary factor to bring the result into the 1000 points/event realm. The original factor was .6. This was later lowered to .55 in the 8th year review.
We decided that if a competitor turned an 800 point caber at 12:00, he would get 800 points. Initially, for every minute less than 12:00, one point was deducted. The 8th year review adjusted this to .6 points for every minute (or 9 points for every 15 minutes; 36 points for an hour).
If a competitor didn’t turn the initial (qualifying) or only caber, we had to determine a way to calculate some points from the side judging (degrees). We first deduct 3 hours of points (108 points) and then convert the degrees to a percentage (i.e., 70 degrees becomes 70%). We then took the points for a 9:00 or a 3:00 turn (800 – 108 = 692 points) times the percentage (692 times 70%) and scored the 70 degree attempt on the 108 point caber at 485 points. Now, you may ask why we didn’t use 70 divided by 90 (78%) for the percentage. We felt that not turning the caber successfully should hurt more than that. In other words, the difference between the 9:00 turn (692 points) and an 89 degree attempt should be more than 8 points. The method we used ended up using makes this difference 76 points.
The rest of the events were pretty straightforward, although the stone put can vary from competition to competition (due to different weights and whether it is open or braemar style). We took the current world records at that time and divided them into 1000 points, then rounded off the points/foot value to be easy to calculate. For instance, the 56# weight for distance calculated out to be 23.4 points/foot. We rounded this to 24 points/foot (it also worked out to 2 points/inch). We did this because we wanted to make it as easy as possible. We couldn’t round off the two hammer events though without making too big a difference in the result. That is why we ended up with 6.67 & 8.23 points/foot for the light and heavy hammers.
I’ve mentioned a few times the 8th year review. I felt we had enough scores by then to reassess the system and we found two interesting things. Both the caber and sheaf were much more heavily weighted in the scores vs. the other 5 events. So we adjusted both of those events, but still left the caber to be a bit more heavily weighted due to the fact it is the premier event.
Once we settled on the values for each event, we decided to NOT adjust them each time a new world record was set. The bookkeeping would be horrendous and competitors would never get comfortable with how much each event was worth. Also, since we realized that each competitor could keep track of how well he/she was doing in relationship to how they did at the last Games or the previous year, that even if he wasn’t climbing in the standings, he would know if he was improving overall. Also, we could then use this scoring to more closely match athletes in their respective classes. And an athlete from a different part of the country who might normally compete as a “B” in his home area, could be evaluated with this system to fit better in an out-of-area Games. We initially set up our classes so that you competed as a “C” until you consistently went over 500 points/event average. B’s were from 500 to 625 and A’s were from 625 to 750. Once a athlete consistently averaged over 750 points/event, the athlete was “encouraged” to turn Pro – but because of many other issues with turning Pro, this move was totally left up to the athlete. The moves from C to B and B to A were mandated by the RMSA. These break points could be adjusted as classes became better.
Another reason we left the event values alone was that we felt the overall score (even if it went over 1000 points/event average) was also a personal record in itself that could be bettered every year. And there is no reason why an athlete couldn’t score over 1000 points in any event. We realize that the Olympic decathlon system is adjusted every so often, but we don’t see a compelling reason to do so.
For the first 10 years or so, we did all the scoring without benefit of a computer, although we had liberal use of calculators.